From b44aaee7ec5c2632b072480f14ca00bda892f341 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: maia arson crimew Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:49:18 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] suspension update --- src/posts/adrian-dittmann.md | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/posts/adrian-dittmann.md b/src/posts/adrian-dittmann.md index 7b23997..c3bd342 100644 --- a/src/posts/adrian-dittmann.md +++ b/src/posts/adrian-dittmann.md @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ title: The Adrian Dittmann Story description: the evidence, from A to Z, and righting the wrongs date: 2025-01-05 +date_changed: 2025-01-05T20:45:00+2 feature_image: /img/posts/adrian-dittmann/cover.jpg coauthor: name: ryan fae @@ -89,4 +90,8 @@ According to Jackie, *The Spectator* decided to remove the line describing our c In short, we don't think the article is very good, and we're unhappy with how our work was used without credit. But despite not being proud of the piece, maia's posts remain up (as does ryan's [statement](https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:lb5rzms2ky5fmp6clthjwuvx/post/3lewpsney6s2n)): we believe that credit is a crucial part of journalism and research as a whole, and if by leveraging popularity around the article's release is the only way to bring attention to that, so be it. -*If you have any additions to this story, please text ryan on Signal at `rhinozz.1337`.* \ No newline at end of file +*If you have any additions to this story, please text ryan on Signal at `rhinozz.1337`.* + +## Update January 5 19:45 UTC + +11 hours after publishing this piece, links to it and the original Spectator piece were [blocked](https://x.com/Mxynyx/status/1875990544939446320), and at least the X accounts of maia, ryan, and Jackie were [suspended for 30 days](https://bsky.app/profile/crimew.gay/post/3leze4ovjes2c). No rule was cited for the suspension. \ No newline at end of file