In new format, each bigram entry has flags (1 byte), a terminal id (3 byte),
a time-stamp (4 byte), a counter (1 byte) and a level (1 byte).
Bug: 10920255
Bug: 10920165
Change-Id: I0f7fc125a6178e6d25a07e8462afc41a7f57e3e1
This reverts commit 56402cf10a.
I'll submit this on 10/16 after the final cut for Bayo.
Change-Id: I0fe4ab64fd8dfa1e63e29adf00388743fca6a1ed
bug: 11144401
This reverts commit 220ce8f269.
Sorry, but we are now in the week before the final cut for the next launch. We shouldn't be taking new features like this at this point. Let me revert this change for now. I'll re-revert this after the cut next week.
Change-Id: Ia8b00680c992ec526e6a858945f2380cbcdfdd55
There used to be two "Swiss" keyboard layouts, labelled fr_CH and de_QY,
available in LatinIME. They were, however, not actually Swiss layouts
but instead work-arounds to be able to get French or German with qwertz
or qwerty (instead of azerty and qwertz) layouts, respectively. These
were thus removed by commit f6972561fc
replacing them with the generic fr-qwertz and de-qwerty layouts instead.
Here, now, is a proper Swiss keyboard layout, following Swiss standards
for people accustomed to typing on Swiss keyboards, with the expected
tailorings for French and German.
Change-Id: I9feed752053ecc694c84db713284f69bc1daf155
- GC gets failure when the dictionary become empty.
- Useless unigrams are sometimes not removed.
Bug: 10197478
Change-Id: I8d1479c01efba61a81f03bc077da6bcb4797a940
This also includes a fix that allows this code to read surrogate
pairs in this processing.
Bug: 11070482
Change-Id: If5ef8d6863938252f09128b7e99ea07ece6e7019
When there are too many bigrams, we stop reading the file,
so the file pointer is in an inconsistent place. This means we
have no idea what's going to happen next. It's better to crash
right away.
Change-Id: Id3b7b78cbe4fda3493b3c9c46758763e1ab5f6a3
Groundwork and implement simple decay.
Increment probability when typed and decrement probability
at GC.
Bug: 6669677
Change-Id: Ib12caead0cbeef4ce7808fe8ac0b00ee331523fe
It was possible that fetchNextTasks() would be called by multiple
threads concurrently.
If it happens, some tasks in the task queues might be ignored.
Change-Id: Idc81c43c45e382da3850cc55b9a42c281548d2a8
