The new behavior is as follows:
- If the word in the dictionary is not fully lower case, then the
exact case is required to match.
- If the word in the dictionary is fully lower case, then any of
the following patterns match:
- fully lower case
- only the first char capitalized
- all caps
Any other capitalization is rejected.
This is probably what people want. If you type a name in all lower
case, it should be marked as a typo, but if you type a word with a
capital for emphasis or just because it's the start of the sentence,
it should match a lower case word in the dictionary. If you have
a spurious capital letter in the middle of a word because of a typo,
it should be marked as such.
Accents are not affected, and should not be. An accented letter
is a different letter and a missing accent should be reported.
We should maybe consider again for some common transpositions
like the "ue" digraph for German, which is now considered a typo,
but will suggest the correct diacritics as the first suggestion.
Bug: 5145751
Change-Id: I651e24f13c90fb94700a1674ad380e95336e7dca
by ignoring its preference value, when the "show settings key option" in
the settings is disabled.
Change-Id: I934be2d9eb0bf6bf731e03f5d9b752de4a7a1c7c
This change refactors the dictionary selection code so that the
cached dictionary files list and the settings tests are more
cleanly separated.
This will also help with future refactorings that will test for
the presence of the main dictionary and insert the fall back if
it's not supplied by the dictionary pack.
Bug: 5095140
Change-Id: I8d7caad7c054031df71fe78b043801a774d50f65
The next step is to move this over to the Utils class.
The ultimate goal is to make use of the duplicate removal code
also in the spell checker as per
Bug: 5175740
Change-Id: Ica36691b843b0713b832c56ffc65e5b2ec427c4a
Now that the dictionary pack can return several files, it's better
to handle IO exceptions for each file rather than globally. This
also will help with next implementation steps.
Bug: 5095140
Change-Id: I5ed135ad2ad4f55f61f9b3f92c48a35d5c24bdb2
As discussed by e-mail, this change implements the proposal of
including a "lets" -> "let's" entry to the whitelist.
Change-Id: Ia7b7737c34ebf85675af78501acd865ce399f38d
