In the practice it works because this never tries to access
inside the suggestion strip, and the worst that can happen
is a wrong text color for a suggestion. But since the two
colors that would be swapped are the same, nobody ever
notices -- unless they are using the GingerBread theme.
Change-Id: Ic8c70d8b3cdddf92946dfefbbc6d061572626c7a
en* : add common app and Google product names
en_GB : also add "filters"
ru : add some missing words
Bug: 11043181
Bug: 12276653
Bug: 12953122
Change-Id: I6b62e681a07b7f0149a10ba4e05954e60d6212d4
File descriptors will be closed in
BinaryDictionary.finalize(); but, this leads to unit test fails.
Bug: 13066902
Change-Id: I2b0d3e54ee91fa844530df54596f86bbbbac81a5
We already have a mechanism to avoid this crash, but it wasn't
used every time it needed to. It's possible that ending a batch
input and starting a batch input happen while suggestions
are being pulled out, which would result in pointers that have
been reset being passed for trimming.
Just increasing the sequence number should get rid of the
problem.
Bug: 12178124
Change-Id: I36ef3bc8a78679bc09daa39e665f5ce1bab50c2a
The heuristic in RichInputConnection makes little sense
when textLength > mExpectedSelStart but we have
more than 1024 characters of text. If there are that many,
it's about 100% sure that 1024 is not the correct cursor
position. With no good guess, we'll just continue trusting
the app, even though we know it's lying : at least it will
make the problem visible to the app author.
Also, there have been a lot of confusion about initialSelStart
and initialSelEnd. The keyboard should log them so that
it helps us and editor authors debug more easily these
common problems.
Issue #65170 in AOSP and
Bug: 12772035
Change-Id: I6665a16c9f2832d33ee323f033bb38bcc092a3b4
When the cursor is moved by the user, the RichInputConnection
is told about it. However, to work around a framework bug, it
also looks at how many characters are in the buffer before the
cursor, and if that's more than the value it's been passed, it
deduces that's a framework bug and there are at least as many
characters as seen before the cursor, so it puts the expected
cursor position there.
When you move the cursor, TextView calls onUpdateSelection,
and when you move it fast, you'll get rapid-fire calls to
onUpdateSelection. This is fine, the RIC is equipped to
deal with that.
However, these calls take some time to make it to the IME. In
this instance, when the first call gets through and the IME
calls TextView (synchronously) for text before the cursor, the
cursor has already moved in the app, and TextView returns more
characters than the cursor position was declared to be in this
instance, so the RIC sets that as the expected cursor position.
Sure enough, a split second later, the second call to
onUpdateSelection arrives, with the new cursor position set
where the RIC had found it too early. The RIC takes that as an
"expected" cursor move, and the input does not get reset.
Luckily, we have a way out. As far as we know, the framework bug
only manifests itself upon rotation, which means we should only
have to adjust for it in onStartInputView. Doing it in
onUpdateSelection is too zealous (and probably too distrustful of
the app to send the correct cursor positions).
So we should just take care of the rotation case (by calling
tryFixLyingCursorPosition in onStartInputView) and remove the
compensating code in resetCachesUponCursorMoves.
Bug: 12982502
Change-Id: Ic3c1408a1ec45deaea63b01d98376a79ae567d77
Jean Chalard
Baligh Uddin
Tadashi G. Takaoka
Keisuke Kuroyanagi