nyancrimew/LatinIME
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Readability improvement

Browse source 
Change-Id: I2f350145f333ba1fa4eb20027b0f41107c2df02c
This commit is contained in:
Jean Chalard 2013-06-26 12:22:04 +09:00
parent 7fcf304c97
commit fb72890ac6
1 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
java/src/com/android/inputmethod/latin/LatinIME.java
View file

@ -928,14 +928,15 @@ public class LatinIME extends InputMethodService implements KeyboardActionListen
final boolean selectionChanged = mLastSelectionStart != newSelStart
|| mLastSelectionEnd != newSelEnd;
// if composingSpanStart and composingSpanEnd are -1, it means there is no composing
// span in the view - we can use that to narrow down whether the cursor was moved
// by us or not. If we are composing a word but there is no composing span, then
// we know for sure the cursor moved while we were composing and we should reset
// the state. TODO: rescind this policy: the framework never removes the composing
// span on its own accord while editing. This test is useless.
final boolean noComposingSpan = composingSpanStart == -1 && composingSpanEnd == -1;
// If the keyboard is not visible, we don't need to do all the housekeeping work, as it
// will be reset when the keyboard shows up anyway.
// TODO: revisit this when LatinIME supports hardware keyboards.
@ -957,7 +958,10 @@ public class LatinIME extends InputMethodService implements KeyboardActionListen
// state-related special processing to kick in.
mSpaceState = SPACE_STATE_NONE;
if ((!mWordComposer.isComposingWord()) || selectionChanged || noComposingSpan) {
// TODO: is it still necessary to test for composingSpan related stuff?
final boolean selectionChangedOrSafeToReset = selectionChanged
|| (!mWordComposer.isComposingWord()) || noComposingSpan;
if (selectionChangedOrSafeToReset) {
// If we are composing a word and moving the cursor, we would want to set a
// suggestion span for recorrection to work correctly. Unfortunately, that
// would involve the keyboard committing some new text, which would move the