Merge "More optimizations" into jb-dev
This commit is contained in:
commit
f5ac6c725a
1 changed files with 11 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -489,10 +489,17 @@ public class BinaryDictInputOutput {
|
||||||
// Merging tails can only be done if there are no attributes. Searching for attributes
|
// Merging tails can only be done if there are no attributes. Searching for attributes
|
||||||
// in LatinIME code depends on a total breadth-first ordering, which merging tails
|
// in LatinIME code depends on a total breadth-first ordering, which merging tails
|
||||||
// breaks. If there are no attributes, it should be fine (and reduce the file size)
|
// breaks. If there are no attributes, it should be fine (and reduce the file size)
|
||||||
// to merge tails, and the following step would be necessary.
|
// to merge tails, and removing the node from the list would be necessary. However,
|
||||||
// If eventually the code runs on Android, searching through the whole array each time
|
// we don't merge tails because breaking the breadth-first ordering would result in
|
||||||
// may be a performance concern.
|
// extreme overhead at bigram lookup time (it would make the search function O(n) instead
|
||||||
list.remove(node);
|
// of the current O(log(n)), where n=number of nodes in the dictionary which is pretty
|
||||||
|
// high).
|
||||||
|
// If no nodes are ever merged, we can't have the same node twice in the list, hence
|
||||||
|
// searching for duplicates in unnecessary. It is also very performance consuming,
|
||||||
|
// since `list' is an ArrayList so it's an O(n) operation that runs on all nodes, making
|
||||||
|
// this simple list.remove operation O(n*n) overall. On Android this overhead is very
|
||||||
|
// high.
|
||||||
|
// For future reference, the code to remove duplicate is a simple : list.remove(node);
|
||||||
list.add(node);
|
list.add(node);
|
||||||
final ArrayList<CharGroup> branches = node.mData;
|
final ArrayList<CharGroup> branches = node.mData;
|
||||||
final int nodeSize = branches.size();
|
final int nodeSize = branches.size();
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue