Reword a confusing comment
Bug: 7005645 Change-Id: Ifd942b3ce242aeeec512e132e1cee31329e994b1
This commit is contained in:
parent
e2ac3932e3
commit
aa27635a8a
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -783,10 +783,10 @@ public class BinaryDictInputOutput {
|
|||
// their lower bound and exclude their higher bound so we need to have the first step
|
||||
// start at exactly 1 unit higher than floor(unigramFreq + half a step).
|
||||
// Note : to reconstruct the score, the dictionary reader will need to divide
|
||||
// MAX_TERMINAL_FREQUENCY - unigramFreq by 16.5 likewise, and add
|
||||
// (discretizedFrequency + 0.5) times this value to get the median value of the step,
|
||||
// which is the best approximation. This is how we get the most precise result with
|
||||
// only four bits.
|
||||
// MAX_TERMINAL_FREQUENCY - unigramFreq by 16.5 likewise to get the value of the step,
|
||||
// and add (discretizedFrequency + 0.5 + 0.5) times this value to get the best
|
||||
// approximation. (0.5 to get the first step start, and 0.5 to get the middle of the
|
||||
// step pointed by the discretized frequency.
|
||||
final float stepSize =
|
||||
(MAX_TERMINAL_FREQUENCY - unigramFrequency) / (1.5f + MAX_BIGRAM_FREQUENCY);
|
||||
final float firstStepStart = 1 + unigramFrequency + (stepSize / 2.0f);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue