nyancrimew
/
LatinIME
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge "[CS8] Add explanations"

main
Jean Chalard 2014-10-29 12:26:23 +00:00 committed by Android (Google) Code Review
parent afe67611c3 67527f847e
commit 93e5cdea71
1 changed files with 28 additions and 16 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

44
java/src/com/android/inputmethod/latin/Suggest.java
View File

@ -160,24 +160,36 @@ public final class Suggest {
|| (consideredWord.length() > 1 && !didRemoveTypedWord);
final boolean hasAutoCorrection;
// TODO: using isCorrectionEnabled here is not very good. It's probably useless, because
// any attempt to do auto-correction is already shielded with a test for this flag; at the
// same time, it feels wrong that the SuggestedWord object includes information about
// the current settings. It may also be useful to know, when the setting is off, whether
// the word *would* have been auto-corrected.
if (!isCorrectionEnabled || !allowsToBeAutoCorrected || resultsArePredictions
|| suggestionResults.isEmpty() || wordComposer.hasDigits()
|| wordComposer.isMostlyCaps() || wordComposer.isResumed()
// If correction is not enabled, we never auto-correct. This is for example for when
// the setting "Auto-correction" is "off": we still suggest, but we don't auto-correct.
if (!isCorrectionEnabled
// If the word does not allow to be auto-corrected, then we don't auto-correct.
|| !allowsToBeAutoCorrected
// If we are doing prediction, then we never auto-correct of course
|| resultsArePredictions
// If we don't have suggestion results, we can't evaluate the first suggestion
// for auto-correction
|| suggestionResults.isEmpty()
// If the word has digits, we never auto-correct because it's likely the word
// was type with a lot of care
|| wordComposer.hasDigits()
// If the word is mostly caps, we never auto-correct because this is almost
// certainly intentional (and careful input)
|| wordComposer.isMostlyCaps()
// We never auto-correct when suggestions are resumed because it would be unexpected
|| wordComposer.isResumed()
// If we don't have a main dictionary, we never want to auto-correct. The reason
// for this is, the user may have a contact whose name happens to match a valid
// word in their language, and it will unexpectedly auto-correct. For example, if
// the user types in English with no dictionary and has a "Will" in their contact
// list, "will" would always auto-correct to "Will" which is unwanted. Hence, no
// main dict => no auto-correct. Also, it would probably get obnoxious quickly.
// TODO: now that we have personalization, we may want to re-evaluate this decision
|| !mDictionaryFacilitator.hasAtLeastOneInitializedMainDictionary()
// If the first suggestion is a shortcut we never auto-correct to it, regardless
// of how strong it is (whitelist entries are not KIND_SHORTCUT but KIND_WHITELIST).
// TODO: we may want to have shortcut-only entries auto-correct in the future.
|| suggestionResults.first().isKindOf(SuggestedWordInfo.KIND_SHORTCUT)) {
// If we don't have a main dictionary, we never want to auto-correct. The reason for
// this is, the user may have a contact whose name happens to match a valid word in
// their language, and it will unexpectedly auto-correct. For example, if the user
// types in English with no dictionary and has a "Will" in their contact list, "will"
// would always auto-correct to "Will" which is unwanted. Hence, no main dict => no
// auto-correct.
// Also, shortcuts should never auto-correct unless they are whitelist entries.
// TODO: we may want to have shortcut-only entries auto-correct in the future.
hasAutoCorrection = false;
} else {
final SuggestedWordInfo firstSuggestion = suggestionResults.first();